Legal Opinion

United States v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1930No. 4358PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment dismissing appellant’s action brought to recover penalties for violation of the Safety Appliance Act (45 USCA § 1 et seq.). The parties filed a written stipulation waiving a jury trial and also submitted an agreed statement of facts. It appeared therefrom that defendant operated a certain passenger train in interstate commerce which consisted of two engines, two tenders, and thirteen steel passenger ears; that one engine and its tender was used as a “pusher” engine and was operated only for a short distance (about four miles) at which place…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. CrockettSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Davis v. ManrySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. New York Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Chicago, St. P., M. &. O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. United States v. The Ogden Union Railway and Depot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  4. Dykes v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Dykes v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API