Legal Opinion

United States v. Chicago, St. P., M. &. O. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 18, 1930No. 8843PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought to recover a penalty prescribed by the Safety Appliance Acts as extended by the Interstate Commerce Commission’s order of June 6, 1910. Judgment was in favor of the defendant, and the government has appealed. The facts were stipulated and are substantially as follows: On October 18, 1928, the railway company, an interstate carrier, was operating over its line in St. Paul, Minn., in an easterly direction for a distance of two miles, a certain passenger train consisting of a locomotive ■engine and tender, eleven passenger cars, and a pusher…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Echols v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. United States v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  3. Dykes v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  5. Dykes v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API