Legal Opinion
Bay Institute v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2003No. Nos. 02-16041, 02-16045; D.C. Nos. CV-97-06140-OWW, CV-98-05261-OWWPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
This case involves the administration by the Department of the Interior (“Interior”) *735of water in California’s Central Valley Project (the “Project”). Appellants San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, et al., and Bay Institute of San Francisco, et al., appeal from a final partial judgment issued by the district court pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b).
The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment challenging the accounting methodology used by Interior in implementing Section 3406(b)(2) of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (“Improvement Act”). The district court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- George Thomas Franklin v. Jim Fox Martin Murray Robert Morse Bryan Cassandro John Cuneo, Sergeant Eileen Franklin-LipskerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Bicycle Trails Council v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- The Wilderness Society and the Alaska Center for the Environment v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Central Valley Water Agency v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.