Legal Opinion

Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Ass'n v. Attorney General

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1985No. Docket 72460PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacKenzie, J.

This case involves the constitutionality of certain Liquor Control Commission regulations restricting advertising of prices or brands of liquor, wine, and beer. The Attorney General appeals from a grant of summary judgment sustaining the regulations. We reverse.

The Liquor Control Commission, established in 1933 under the Michigan Liquor Control Act, is charged with the duty of controlling the manufacture, possession, transportation, and sale of alcoholic beverages within the State of Michigan. MCL 436.1; MSA 18.971. The commission is further directed to adopt rules and regulations to carry…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Bio-Magnetic Resonance, Inc v. Department of Public HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. MICHIGAN Ex Rel OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Fieger v. CoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API