Fieger v. Cox
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.
These consolidated appeals arise from an investigation conducted by defendants into plaintiffs’ alleged criminal violations of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.201 et seq. We hold that plaintiffs improperly sought to challenge district court orders by initiating original civil actions for superintending control, mandamus, and injunctions and that the circuit court erred by failing to dismiss the cases.
I. NATURE OF THE CASE
The Attorney General investigated attorney Geoffrey Fieger for illegal interference with the election of a justice to our Supreme Court, as well as attempts…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Lee v. MacOmb County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- People ex rel. Sutherland v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fieger v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- People of Michigan v. William Lawrence RuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Okrie v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Detroit Edison Company v. StenmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- SER Discover Financial Services, Inc. v. Hon. David W. Nibert and SER Glaxosmithkline, LLC v. Hon. James H. Young, Jr.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.