Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DiMatteo

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 2, 1981PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

In perpetrating the crimes of which they stand convicted — larceny, 2 unlawful possession of a firearm, 3 armed robbery 4 and unlawful carrying of a firearm 5 — the defendants laid less than cunning plans. They arrived and left the scene of the crime, during daylight, in a silver Buick convertible automobile with the top down. It is hardly surprising that the police were able to catch the defendants within minutes of the robbery.

1. Lawfulness of the Automobile Search.

As a threshold issue, the defendants appeal from the refusal of a Superior Court judge to suppress a brown suede handbag which…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Caldwell v. Maloney, etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Eugene LeslieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. CurtissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API