Commonwealth v. Curtiss
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
Convicted of rape and indecent assault and battery, the defendant appealed to the Appeals Court. A divided panel of the Appeals Court determined that the judge erroneously disallowed the defendant’s peremptory challenge to a black man on the venire where the complainant was black and the defendant white. The Appeals Court ordered a new trial. Commonwealth v. Curtiss, 40 Mass. App. Ct. 350 (1996). We allowed the Commonwealth’s application for further appellate review. We conclude that the trial judge’s deci*79sion to disallow the peremptory challenge should be affirmed. We also conclude that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. GarreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. LyonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.