Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harris

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 6, 1991PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

We granted further appellate review to determine whether the prosecutor improperly used a peremptory challenge to exclude the sole black person from the venire from which the trial jury was picked for the defendant’s trial. A divided panel of the Appeals Court concluded that the judge did not abuse his discretion in allowing the challenge. See 28 Mass. App. Ct. 724, 728 (1990). We disagree, and conclude that the trial judge should have disallowed the challenge. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction and order a new trial.

The defendant, a black man, was convicted of murder in the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. FryarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Brewer v. Marshall, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. LongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API