Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 1, 1929No. 26,536PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Action brought by the state under L. 1925, p. 558, c. 407, 1 Mason Minn. St. §§ 4031-1 to 4031-35, known as the forestry act, to recover the expense incurred in fighting a forest fire alleged to have been started by defendant and negligently allowed to escape from his premises. The jury returned a verdict for $1,879.74, and defendant appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

It was stated at the argument that the trial occupied over a week. The evidence has not been transcribed. Defendant presented to the trial court a proposed bill of exceptions, which contained the charge, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Little v. Lynn & Marblehead Real Estate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. County of Ventura v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Miller v. SabinskeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Eldred v. Division of Employment and SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API