Legal Opinion
Korman v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 16, 2013No. 12-CV-1561 (JFB)(ARL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge:
Plaintiff Barry S. Korman (“plaintiff’ or “Korman”) seeks relief pursuant to the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and under common law against UnitedHealthCare Service LLC (“defendant” or “United”).1 Specifically, Korman seeks damages arising from United’s alleged misrepresentation as to the Lifetime Maximum Medical Benefits available to Korman under his employer’s benefits plans after he had retired from his job.2 United filed a motion to dismiss Korman’s amended complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York State Psychiatric Ass'n v. Unitedhealth GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Prestige Institute For Plastic Surgery, PC v. Aetna, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Vollmer v. Xerox CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022