Legal Opinion

Vollmer v. Xerox Corporation

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided February 14, 2022No. 6:20-cv-06979Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK __________________________________________ PAUL VOLLMER and MARILYN VOLLMER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, DECISION AND ORDER vs. 20-CV-6979 (CJS) XEROX CORPORATION, PLAN ADMINISTRATOR COMMITTEE, XEROX MEDICAL CARE PLAN FOR RETIRED EMPLOYEES, XEROX DENTAL CARE PLAN, and XEROX CORPORATION 1986 ENHANCED EARLY RETIREMENT PROGRAM, Defendants. __________________________________________ Plaintiffs Paul and Marilyn Vollmer (collectively, “the Vollmers”) filed this putative class action against…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API