Legal Opinion

Krupa v. Kelley

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 1, 1968No. File No. CV 7-6512-7398PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtToscano, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle owned by the defendant Cumberland Farms Dairy Products, Inc., and operated by its admitted agent, Cordon F. Kelley, the named defendant. The court rendered judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs have appealed, claiming that the court erred in its findings and conclusions. The court’s conclusions are set forth in a memorandum of decision which under our rules becomes a part of the record on appeal. Practice Book § 992. The Statute…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. Kennedy v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Lippitt v. AshleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Woodling v. Garrett Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Hamilton v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Lyden v. GoldbergOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Turner v. TurnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hamilton v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API