Hamilton v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
On this appeal from summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs medical malpractice suit, we must analyze a section of Connecticut’s statute of limitation. Strong public policy considerations generally mandate that a plaintiff promptly assert his claim. Defendants contend that when a state legislature enacts a statute of repose it is well aware that such rule will on occasion produce a harsh result. And, defendants continue, for courts to strain to find exceptions to the legislation will simply fuel endless or limitless litigation. Yet, here, as plaintiff points out, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. W.R. Grace & Co.--Conn.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bank of India v. Sapru (In Re Sapru)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Thaler v. Erdheim (In Re Erdheim)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- In Re State Police LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.