Legal Opinion

Marriage of Clark v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 2002No. CX-01-1428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORITSKY, Judge. *

Appellant-mother Kathleen Clark petitioned to dissolve her marriage to respondent-father Steven Clark. Discovery disputes occurred regarding whether father fully produced his financial information. After the parties entered into an oral stipulation in court, mother discharged her attorney before the attorney could draft a proposed judgment. Father’s attorney drafted a proposed judgment, but mother’s new attorney objected to entry of a judgment based on it. The court nonetheless adopted father’s proposed judgment. Mother moved to reopen under Minn.Stat. § 518.145,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Jorstad v. IDS Realty TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Szarzynski v. SzarzynskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Marriage of Gottsacker v. GottsackerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. George Reilly, Trustee of the Nathan L. Bentson 1993 Irrevocable Trust v. Michael J. Antonello, and Michael J. Antonello & Associates, Ltd. and Michael J. Antonello & Associates, Ltd. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Intervenor.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API