Legal Opinion

Rose v. Cardinal Industries, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1990No. S-89-15PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abood, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas which denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment, granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellants’ complaint. Appellants have appealed setting forth two assignments of error:

“I. The trial court erred in holding that the case of Damas v. Thompson, C.A. No. L-84-155 (Lucas County, C.A. unreported September 14, 1984) is controlling upon the instant action.
“II. The trial court erred in holding that reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion, and that conclusion being…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jeffers v. OlexoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Light v. Ohio UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Thrash v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood Assoc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Titanium Industries v. S.E.A., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Bierl v. BGZ Assoc. II, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API