Legal Opinion

Thrash v. Hill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1980No. 79-1357PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Civ. R. 56(C), summary judgment may be rendered where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Further, the party against whom the motion is made is entitled to have the evidence construed most strongly in his favor. Summary judgment may not be rendered unless it appears that reasonable minds- can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion is made.

In this cause, the courts below held that appellant was not entitled to the relief demanded because, as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Berkowitz v. WinstonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Ripple v. Mahoning National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Laster v. BowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Tair v. Rook Investment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Strayer v. LindemanOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rose v. Cardinal Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. King v. Emergency Med. TransportOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Hawkins v. K&D Mgt., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API