Rice v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor Railway
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Alfred Rice against the Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor Railway to recover excess fare paid under protest. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.
The defendant and appellant in this cause is a street railway that maintains and operates a railway between the cities of Detroit and Ann Arbor, in the township of Springwells, in the village and township of Dearborn, and other places. The cars of the defendant go over the track of the Detroit Citizens’ Street-Railway Company to the city hall, in the city of Detroit. Defendant has been selling five tickets for 50 cents, each good for a trip between the city hall, in the city of Detroit, and the village of Dearborn. Each of the five tickets is divided into two parts, — one good from the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kissane v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by11 opinions
- Charles Simons Sons Co. v. Maryland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
- Township of Ross v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Vining v. Detroit, Ypsilanti, Ann Arbor & Jackson RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Coy v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Atlantic Coast Electric Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.