Legal Opinion

Kissane v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Thomas Kissane against the Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor Railway to recover excess fare paid under protest. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The defendant owns and operates a line of street railway between the cities of Ann Arbor and Detroit. This line passes through the townships of Canton, Nankin, Dearborn, the village of Wayne, and other townships and villages not material to this case. The *176agreement or franchise from the township of Canton, so far as is material to the case, is as follows:

“The rate of fare for any distance on the line of said railway within the said township of Canton shall not exceed five cents, but the rate of fare for any distance on the line of said railway outside of said township shall not exceed two…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rice v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Township of Ross v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Coy v. Detroit, Ypsilanti & Ann Arbor RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Township of Ross v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API