Legal Opinion

Tin Pan Apple, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 14, 1990No. 88 Civ. 4085 (CSH)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

Plaintiff’s amended complaint asserts causes of action for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq., false designation of origin and unfair competition under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125(a), and state statutory and common law claims under'principles of pendent jurisdiction.

Defendants move under Rule 12(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In the alternative, defendants move under Rule 12(e) and (f) for a more definite statement and to strike certain…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
  2. Jackson v. OdenatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Prudhomme v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
  4. Eveready Battery Co., Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API