Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Terhaar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 22, 2000No. CA A104528; 9802-61282; CA A105759PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this domestic relations case, wife appeals a judgment of dissolution, assigning error to the trial court’s division of real and personal property and its failure to award spousal support. Husband also appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s award of attorney fees to wife. We affirm, writing only to address wife’s contentions concerning the division of property.

Husband and wife were married for approximately six years, although they lived together for only four-and-one-half years. There are no minor children. Husband, age 48, is an attorney. Wife, age 49, has a master’s degree in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In re the Marriage of BudgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Matter of Marriage of TaraghiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of HixsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Owens-Koenig v. KoenigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. In re the Marriage of Fuernsteiner-PerinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API