Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 10, 1948No. [No. 2, October Term, 1948.]PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Here are two appeals in one record by Margaret E. Smith and Ruth Schuchman, appellants, from judgments and sentences on conviction of unlawfully making and selling books or pools on horse races and keeping a house for the purpose of betting and gambling. The cases were tried by the trial judge sitting as a jury.

The appellants contend, firstly and thirdly, that there was not sufficient showing of probable cause set forth in the affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued, (Code, Article 27, Section 306), and therefore the search warrant should have been quashed and evidence obtained…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Sugarman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Callahan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. State v. LambSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Everhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API