Legal Opinion

State v. Miranda

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 14, 1996No. 14439PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgments of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of six counts of assault in the first degree 1 in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3), 2 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21. 3 He claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. The defendant further claims that the trial court improperly restricted cross-examination of a witness and excluded certain testimony.

The central issue in this appeal is whether a person, who is not the biological or legal parent of a child and does not owe a legal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. State v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. State v. MarsalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API