Legal Opinion

Grove v. Brandenburg

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

— Trespass on the case. The declaration contains two counts. The first count is to the following effect: That the defendant wickedly intending to injure the plaintiff, &c., on, &c., falsely and maliciously informed one Archibald Estep, that the plaintiff had said that he, Estep, was a horsethief; that, by means thereof, the defendant did then and there, wickedly and maliciously, procure Estep to prosecute the plaintiff in slander for the supposed speaking of said words ; that, afterwards, when said action came on to be tried, the defendant, with the intent aforesaid, procured himself to be…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. RobeIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Baldwin v. HutchisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Hermon v. JobesIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Copeland v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Bell v. SenneffIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API