Baldwin v. Hutchison
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.
The appellee’s complaint was in two paragraphs, each of which was attacked by demurrer. The special verdict of the jury clearly shows that the judgment is founded upon the second paragraph of complaint. It is therefore unnecessary for us to consider the sufficiency of the first paragraph, since, if the second is good, any error in overruling a demurrer to the first will be deemed harmless. Elliott’s App. Proced., section 637; Doan v. Dow, 8 Ind. App. 324.
By the second paragraph of complaint the following state of facts is shown:
Appellee was regularly subpoenaed and testified as a witness in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Calkins v. SumnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Town Council of Cahaba v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Higham v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Thompson v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Buchanan v. SahleinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- William M. Giffin v. Jack Summerlin, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Hill v. BeghinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- New Kentucky Coal Co. v. AlbaniIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Lipman, Wolfe & Co. v. Phœnix Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.