Legal Opinion

Holland Et Ux. v. Cooper

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1951No. 13752_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Federal jurisdiction in this case depends solely upon diversity of citizenship between the parties. The action arose, in Georgia, out of a collision between two automobiles; and the liability of the appellee is predicated solely upon the doctrine of respondeat superior. Our decision under that doctrine is governed by the laws of the State of Georgia. At the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court sustained the motion of appellee for an involuntary dismissal as to him, and judgment was entered in his favor.

It is undisputed that the collision between the automobile…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. MaltsbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Luke v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Watts v. StarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. Franklin County Lumber Co. v. Grady CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Samuel Clvin Tripp v. United States of America, Charles Clarence Tripp, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  3. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  4. United States v. R.S. Rainwater, Sr., D/B/A R.S. Rainwater & Sons, United States of America v. Citizens National Bank, Walnut Ridge, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  5. McGuire v. Gem City Motors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API