Legal Opinion

Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Maltsby

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 6, 1892PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Evidence. Witness. Charge. Railroad. Negligence. Before Judge Miller. Bibb superior court. April term, 1892.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

The injury on account of which the action was brought was the mashing of the plaintiff's hand while *631lie was coupling cars as' a “ car- coupler ” of the defendant. The following appeared from the evidence: A train of cars attached to an engine was to be coupled to a single car, and the plaintiff signalled to the engineer to back the train towards the car. The train came back slowly until within about twelve inches of the car, and stopped. The plaintiff, who had gotten between the train and the car in order to make the coupling, signalled again, doing so with a coupling-stick…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Central Railroad v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Watts v. StarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Jones v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Brown v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Haas & Howell v. GodbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. McRae v. WilbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API