Legal Opinion

People v. Vargas

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1993No. E009786PublishedCited by 52 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction by plea of guilty to one count of robbery with a firearm use enhancement also admitted. On appeal defendant contends that the court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a continuance which he brought on the eve of trial immediately after the court granted his motion to proceed in propria persona (pro. per.) thereby denying his right to effective assistance of counsel. He further contends the court erred in reducing his conduct credits by 10 days at his sentencing hearing.

The People contend this appeal should be dismissed because…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. SeguraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. SherrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Kim v. EUROMOTORS WEST/THE AUTO GALLERYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API