Legal Opinion

Tombari v. Blankenship-Dixon Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 3, 1978No. 1983-3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bradford, J. *

The Tombaris and Delays appeal from a judgment denying specific performance of a preemptive right for the purchase of one-third of a shopping center site at one-third of its value. Alternatively, they seek to compel formation of a new corporation to hold title to the shopping center site. Respondent Western Real Property cross-appeals from an order denying the costs of taking published depositions. We affirm the denial of specific performance of the preemptive right and the refusal to compel formation of the corporation. We reverse the order denying the costs of taking published…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kershner v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Bellingham First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Bain v. Clallam County Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Shoemaker v. ShaugCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge v. Most Worshipful Universal Grand LodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kiewit-Grice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. Trecker v. LangelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Wilson v. WhineryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Estate of PlummerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Chan v. SmiderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API