Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Groisman v. Goldberg & Rimberg PLLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 26, 2019No. 1:18-cv-07989Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DANIEL GROISMAN, Plaintiff, 18-CV-7989 (JPO) -v- OPINION AND ORDER GOLDBERG & RIMBERG PLLC and ISRAEL GOLDBERG, Defendants. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Daniel Groisman brings this legal malpractice action against his former attorneys, Defendants Goldberg & Rimberg PLLC and Israel Goldberg (together, “Goldberg”). Goldberg has now moved to dismiss Groisman’s complaint for failure to state a cognizable claim to relief or, barring dismissal, to stay this case pending the conclusion of a related case that is currently…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API