Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1987No. Appeal, No. 1316 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Barbieri,

In this workmen’s compensation cáse, we are required to decide whether the Workmen’s Compensation Supersedeas Fund (Fund), created pursuant to Section 443(b) of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act), 77 P.S. §999(b), must honor a claim by Lu-kens Steel Company (Employer) for weekly benefits paid. Walter D. Arasin (Claimant) during the period of Claimant’s default in failing to comply with an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) directing that Claimant submit to a medical examination under Section 314 of the Act, 77 P.S. §651.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Wilkes-Barre v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. L. Edinger v. Rhodes Salvage/E. Rhodes (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API