Leigh v. Green
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Knox county. Heard below before Robinson, J. Rehearing of case reported in 62 Nebr., 344. This case was taken to the supreme court of the United States, on writ of error issued by Melville W. Fuller, Chief Justice, July 22, 1902. The federal question involved is a claim on behalf of plaintiff in error (appellee in this court) that sections 4 and 6 of article 5 of chapter 77, Compthed Statutes, is in conflict with the fourteenth amendment to…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court for Knox county. Heard below before Robinson, J. Rehearing of case reported in 62 Nebr., 344. This case was taken to the supreme court of the United States, on writ of error issued by Melville W. Fuller, Chief Justice, July 22, 1902. The federal question involved is a claim on behalf of plaintiff in error (appellee in this court) that sections 4 and 6 of article 5 of chapter 77, Compthed Statutes, is in conflict with the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States.—Reporter.
1Opinion of the Court
Pound, C.
The issues of fact and law involved in this appeal are sufficiently stated in the former opinion. Many of the conclusions reached in that opinion are acquiesced in by the parties, and have not been reargued. Four propositions, however, are insisted upon by counsel for appellee as hav*535ing been overlooked or wrongly determined, and require consideration. These propositions are whether an affidavit for service by publication, made upon information and belief only, is sufficient; whether the description of the land in the published notice was sufficient to give the court jurisdiction in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Springer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Weimer v. BunburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- City of Atchison v. BartholowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
- Cohen v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Taylor v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Gautier v. . DitmarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.