Legal Opinion
Stehlin-Miller-Henes Co. v. City of Bridgeport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 4, 1922PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The report of the committee found the following facts: On January 23d, 1914, Durkin and contracted with defendant city to construct a high-school building exclusive of the heating, ventilating, plumbing and electric work, on or before April 23d, 1915. On January 14th, 1914, plaintiff made two contracts with defendant, one to do the electric work on or before April 23d, 1915, under a penalty of $10 per day for delay, the other to do the heating and ventilating work on or before May 23d, 1915, under a penalty of $25 per day for delay. Each of the contracts made with plaintiff contained this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fox v. City of South NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Tobey v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Geary v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- McKeon v. ByingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
3Cited by15 opinions
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Frank T. Hickey, Inc. v. Los Angeles Jewish Community CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hartford Electric Applicators of Thermalux, Inc. v. AldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.