Legal Opinion

Dayberry v. City of East Helena

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2003No. 01-839PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Jeremy Dayberry (Dayberry), a minor, and his mother, Debbie Lehrkamp, appeal the judgment of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting the City of Helena’s (the City) motion for summary judgment.

¶2 We address the following issue on appeal and affirm:

¶3 Did the District Court err in granting the City’s motion for summary judgment when Dayberry did not present expert testimony in establishing his negligence and strict liability claims?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶4 On June 26, 1997, Dayberry went swimming at the City’s municipal swimming pool. While at the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hulse v. State, Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Durbin v. RossMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lemay v. BurnettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Tin Cup County Water v. Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Albert v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Victor v. SHEPHERD SCHOOL DISTRICT 37Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Western Security Bank v. Eide Bailly LLPMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Dubiel v. Montana Department of TransportationMontana Supreme Court · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API