Legal Opinion
Culp v. Robey
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1927No. 1008-4888PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the honorable Court of Civil Appeals, 294 S. W. 647.
A basic question is whether the petition exhibits a debt, created by defendant’s “fraud * * * while acting as an officer or in any fiduciary capacity.” If the petition does that, his discharge in bankruptcy is not a defense (subparagraph 4, § 17, 30 Stat. L. 550, 32 Stat. L. 798 [11 USCA § 35]), and there is lack of warrant for the judgment.
We exclude from consideration all other questions, and specifically these: (a) Whether, in truth, the form and substance of the “association” is a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Hollister v. McCameyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Victor Refining Co. v. City National Bank of CommerceTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Wells v. MacKay Telegraph-Cable Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- West Side Oil Co. v. McDormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City National Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Pfeuffer v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.