Legal Opinion
Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1935No. 6800PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Commissioner.
Suit was by the City National Bank of Wichita Falls, defendant in error, against Wichita Royalty Company and E. E. Scan-nell, as its trustee and individually. Recovery was sought by the bank of a balance alleged to be due on two notes, one executed, and the other indorsed, by the Royalty Company, together with foreclosure of liens on certain properties. The Royalty Company, through E. E. Scannell, trustee, pleaded various defenses and filed its cross-action against the bank, and. impleaded J. T. Harrell, one of its principal officers, seeking from both recovery of the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Halifax Corp. v. Wachovia BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City National Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Bradley v. Ingalls (In Re Bradley)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Southwestern Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Knox Glass Bottle Co. v. UnderwoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.