Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Moses

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1927No. 20648. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Rosenthal, seeks foreclosure of his claimed landlord’s lien for rent of his storeroom, upon certain goods and store fixtures kept therein, as against his tenant, Phoenix Department Store, a corporation, and the defendant, Moses, the department store’s mortgagee of the goods and fixtures. A trial in the superior court for King county resulted in a decree awarding to Rosenthal relief as prayed for, from which the defendant Moses has appealed to this court.

The controlling facts of this case are admitted by the pleadings and by stipulation filed in the case, and may be summarized…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skookum Lumber Co. v. Sacajawea Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hines v. Pacific Car Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Fitch v. GoetjenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. ShrollWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Jacobson v. McClanahanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sun Realty Co. v. Dorhmann Hotel Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API