Hines v. Pacific Car Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered May 3, 1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for conversion, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Appellant sold and delivered 'to respondent a truck, in consideration of a cash payment and future payments to he made on the installment plan. The transaction was evidenced by a “memorandum of conditional sale,” signed by both parties. Among other tMngs, the contract provided that, if the Pacific Car Company, their agents, etc., “shall at any time deem themselves insecure,” they shall have the right to terminate the contract, retake the propérty, and retain, as liquidated damages, all moneys paid on the purchase thereof. Prior to the maturity of the first deferred payment, appellant, without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Camp v. NeufelderWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Skookum Lumber Co. v. Sacajawea Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Hughes v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Van Horn v. Van De Wol, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Jacobson v. McClanahanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Rosenthal v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- McNulty v. Baker Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1960