Legal Opinion

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & Forestry

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1994No. 920321PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Consolidation Coal Company and Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Company (collectively “Consol”) appeal, and the Utah Division of State Lands and Forestry, the Utah Board of State Lands and Forestry, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, and various individual defendants employed by the State of Utah (collectively the “State”) cross-appeal, a decision of the Seventh Judicial District Court of Emery County. This case involves the proper interpretation of the royalty provision in a coal lease entered into between the State and Consol and the amount of royalties and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Smith v. Fairfax Realty, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wilcox v. Anchor-Wate Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Wilson Supply, Inc. v. Fradan Manufacturing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API