Legal Opinion

Lochte v. Leon & H. Blum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1895No. 558PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This suit was originally brought by the appellees, for themselves and other creditors of C. F. Priess similarly situated who might see proper to come into the suit, against F. W. Lochte, for the purpose of having the conveyance from C. F. Priess to F. W. Lochte, set out in our conclusion of facts, declared a general statutory assignment; to enjoin the grantee from distributing the property transferred, or its proceeds, among the creditors sought by the instrument to be preferred; and to have the grantee file a bond as required by our statute governing assignments for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoffman, Burneston & Co. v. MackallOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Sabine & E. T. R'y Co. v. JoachimiTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Johnson v. J. M. Robinson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Coffin v. DouglassTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Preston v. Carter Bros. & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Sabichi v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Thurber Const. Co. v. KemplinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Barnes v. LPP Mortgage, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, Appellant v. SHELBY COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API