Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dunleavy v. Miller

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1992No. Nos. 11907, 11933Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBivins, Judge

Because I would affirm the decision of the district court in refusing to give the sudden emergency instruction to the jury, I cannot agree with that portion of the majority opinion. I do agree with the majority’s discussion of the costs issues raised and concur in that portion of the opinion only.

I. Sudden Emergency

Plaintiff tendered the following sudden emergency instruction that tracked SCRA 1986, 13-1617:

A person who, without negligence on his part, is suddenly and unexpectedly confronted with peril, arising from either the actual presence or the appearance of an imminent danger to himself…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Williamson v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Knapp v. StanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Archibeque v. HomrichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Simonson v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API