Legal Opinion · Dissent

Briggs v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 29, 2006No. S06A1146Published

1DissentMelton, Justice

OCGA § 16-8-60 (b)3 prohibits a substantial amount of constitutionally-protected speech, including anonymous political speech which has long been acknowledged to play “an important role in the progress of mankind.” Talley v. California, 362 U. S. 60, 64 (80 SC 536, 4 LE2d 559) (1960); McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm., 514 U. S. 334, 342 (II) (115 SC 1511, 131 LE2d 426) (1995) (“[A]n author’s decision to remain anonymous, like other decisions concerning omissions or additions to the content of a publication, is an aspect of freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment.”). As a result, I…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Talley v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Etkind v. SuarezSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. State v. FieldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API