Legal Opinion

People v. Layman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1931No. Docket No. 2091PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

We are of the opinion that appellant was properly found guilty of both perjury and subornation of perjury. Two depositions were taken in an action which had been brought, by appellant, against the Los Angeles Railway Co., for injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon him as he was pushing his stalled automobile away from the street-car tracks. In the first deposition, appellant himself testified as to the details of the accident. In the second, a Mrs. Miller testified, at appellant’s instigation, that she witnessed the accident. The evidence, in the case under review,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. NorthcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. BurnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Gall v. Union Ice CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. RissmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. HewlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API