State v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant alleges that his conviction for attempted first degree murder was based on a denial of his right to confrontation, erroneous evidentiary rulings, confusing jury instructions and insufficient evidence. Appellant also alleges that the jury verdict is inconsistent and that his upward sentencing departure was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. We affirm.
FACTS
For approximately a year prior to February 1988, appellant Gary Lee Brown and his family were harassed by persons suspected to be gang members. Because of the harassment, appellant, who indicated that he…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. BakkenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. JaworskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. YangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.