Legal Opinion
McNeil v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 10, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0886PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Judie McNeil alleges under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that the District of Columbia Public Schools denied her child a “free appropriate public education,” in part by failing to develop and implement an adequate individualized education program (IEP). Compl. ¶ 1. McNeil’s Complaint identifies two administrative decisions that addressed her son’s IEP — one in 2012 and another in 2014. The Complaint does a poor job of specifying which of these two decisions she now challenges, creating…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hettinga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Washington Ass'n for Television & Children v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- B.D. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Lemus v. ShaffnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022