Legal Opinion
McNally Wellman Co. v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 18, 1995No. 1650; Docket 94-9273PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to construe a contract clause excluding incidental and consequential damages under New York law. McNally Wellman Company, a division of Boliden Allis, Inc. (McNally), brought this diversity action to recover on a construction contract between its predecessor, Dravo Corporation,1 and New York State Electric & Gas Company (NYSEG), for the sale of six spillway gates and other equipment for a dam project. NYSEG filed counterclaims seeking recovery of the costs it incurred from McNally’s delay in delivering the gates. The United States District Court…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Mcnally Wellman Company v. New York State Electric & Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- InspiRX Inc. v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.