Legal Opinion

Flowers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 18, 1991No. 322-90PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of theft of oilfield equipment and assessed punishment at confinement for four years. See V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 31.03(e)(5)(A)(ii). The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, holding that pre-trial amendments of the indictment violated Article 28.10(c), V.A.C.C.P. Flowers v. State, 785 S.W.2d 890 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1990). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to address the Court of Appeals’ interpretation of Art. 28.10(c). 1

The indictment charging appellant with theft of oilfield equipment…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Fortune v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by85 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Trejos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Chavis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  5. Bynum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API