Legal Opinion
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Adams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 21, 1996No. 95-969PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
This is another in the recent series of legal malpractice suits. In this one, Steve Adams, the attorney, agreed to represent Tyson Foods, Inc., in two separate underlying actions: one was to quiet tide to a tract of land in Pope County, and the other was to defend a foreclosure action involving the same land. Both cases were removed to Federal District Courts for the Eastern District of Arkansas, the quiet-tide action to the court of District Judge Henry Woods and the foreclosure action to the court of District Judge Susan Wright. Adams was negligent in his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Skinner v. R.J. Griffin & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Anthony v. KaplanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Bruce G. Murphy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Southeast Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pugh v. GriggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Sturgis v. SkokosSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Chambers v. SternSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.