Legal Opinion
Bruce G. Murphy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Southeast Bank, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 4, 1995No. 93-5268, 93-5412PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.
GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
Bruce Murphy, an investor in an unsuccessful real estate venture, seeks damages from the FDIC on the theory that the failed bank that financed the venture, of which the FDIC is the receiver, was responsible for his loss. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the FDIC upon the ground that the appellant’s claims are barred both by federal common law, see D’Oench, Duhme & Co., Inc. v. FDIC, 315 U.S. 447, 62 S.Ct. 676, 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942), and by 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e). We hold that (1) § 1823(e) does not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Daniel Cowin v. Charles S. BreslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. DeglauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Murphy v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Murphy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Divall Insured Income Fund Limited Partnership, a Wisconsin Limited Partnership v. Boatmen's First National Bank of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Adams v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.