Legal Opinion

People v. Carmony

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2004No. S115090PublishedCited by 456 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In this case, defendant Keith Ishmeal Carmony pled guilty to one count for failure to register in violation of Penal Code section 290, *371subdivision (g)(2)1 and admitted that he had suffered three prior “strikes” under the three strikes law. (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12.) Carmony moved to dismiss these strikes pursuant to section 1385, but the trial court refused to do so and sentenced him to 26 years to life in accordance with the three strikes law. We now consider what standard of review should be applied to the trial court’s decision not to dismiss or strike a sentencing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by456 opinions

  1. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

451 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API