People v. Espinoza
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtYegan, J.
*319Here we hold that Ident-A-Drug, an internet drug reference work, comes within the published compilation exception to the hearsay rule set forth in Evidence Code section 1340.
*648Jose Antonio Espinoza appeals his conviction by jury of possession of a controlled substance (methadone and clonazepam pills) in a jail facility ( Pen. Code, § 4573.6, subd. (a) )1 and two counts of resisting, obstructing or delaying a peace officer (§ 148, subd. (a))(1)). He admitted four prior prison term enhancements (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) and was sentenced to four years felony jail with mandatory supervision. (§ 1170,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. ReddCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. LuaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. ZackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. StampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. VeamatahauCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Yaffee v. SkeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Yaffee v. SkeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Yaffee v. SkeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024